Verified TAE Exam Dumps PDF [2023] Access using TestKingFree [Q19-Q36]

Rate this post

Verified TAE Exam Dumps PDF [2023] Access using TestKingFree

Try Best TAE Exam Questions from Training Expert TestKingFree

BCS TAE Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Explain the factors to consider in implementing automation within new feature testing Understand the factors in transitioning from manual to automation testing
Topic 2	Analyze factors of implementation, use, and maintenance requirements for a given TAS Understand design considerations for a TAA
Topic 3	Explain the factors to consider in implementing automated regression testing Factors to Consider when Implementing Automation within New Feature Testing
Topic 4	Explain the factors to be considered when identifying reusability of components Apply components of the generic TAA (gTAA) to construct a purpose-built TAA
Topic 5	Analyze test automation tools for a given project and report technical findings and recommendations Design the appropriate TAA for a given project
Topic 6	Apply guidelines that support effective test tool pilot and deployment activities Explain the role that layers play within a TAA

Q19. Your goal is to verify completeness, consistency and correct behavior of an automated test suite. The TAS has been proven to successfully install in the SUT environment. All the preliminary checks toverify the correct functioning of the automated test environment and test tool configuration, installation and setup have successfully completed.
Which of the following is NOT a relevant check for achieving your goal in this scenario?

Checking whether all the test cases contain the expected results

Checking whether the post condition have been fulfilled for all the test cases

Checking whether the loading of the TAS is repeatable in the SUT environment

Checking whether all the test casesproduce repeatable outcomes

Q20. Consider a TAS that is going to bedeployed for the first time. The TAS requires share resources and run it its own test environment. The infrastructure for the TAS has been created along with maintenance procedures. It is very unlikely the TAS will be required to work in other target Environments. There is a high-risk that when the TAS is deployed in its own test environment, a number of existing application will no longer work because of conflicts with the existing shared resources.
Which of the following activities would you expect tobe MOST effective at mitigating the risk associated with the first deployment of the TAS?

Testing the TAS for application compatibility issues in the target environment

Testing the TAS for its ability to be implemented in other target test environments.

Testing the TAS for regressions due to optimization that fix non-functional issues.

Testing the TAS for ITS ability to run a shared test environment

Q21. As a TAE you are evaluating a functional test automation tool that will be for several projects within yourorganization. The projects require that tool to work effectively and efficiently with SUT’s in distributed environments. The test automated tool also needs to interface with other existing test tools (test management tool and defect tracking tool.) The existing test tools subject to planned updates and their interface to the test automated tool may not work property after these updates.
Which of the following are the two LEAST important concerns related to the evaluation of the test automation in this scenario?
* Is the test automation tool able to launch processors and execute test cases on multiple machines in different environments?
* Does the test automation tool support a licensing scheme that allows accessing different sets?
* Does the testautomation tool have a large feature set, but only part of the features will be sets?
* Do the release notes for the planned updates on existing specify the impacts on their interfaces to other tools?
Does the test automation tool need to install specific libraries that could impact the SUT?

A and C

A and E

B and E

C and D

Q22. A project consists of distributed teams working in a 24-hour environment, where activities happen at all hours of the day. This project adopts a CI (Continuous Integration) process when developer check-in code and consists of automated activities that include generating a build and deploying it to a test environment.
Automated integration tests are run multiple times a day. The project have asked for a report containing the automation test results for every build, which must be available 24/7 to the project team.
Which of the following would be the BEST way to automatically provides this report?

Store the execution results of the integration tests for the last build to adatabase (without overwriting the results from the previous builds), use this database to automatically update a dashboard containing the build history and test results accessible to the project team.

Store the execution result of the integration testsfor the last build to a database (overwriting the results from the previous build), automatically create a test execution report for this build send It via e-mail to the project team

Store the execution results of the integration tests for the last build to a database (without overwriting the results from the previous builds). Automatically create a test execution report for this build and send it via e-mail to the project team

Store the code coverage results of the integration tests for the last build to a database (without overwriting the results from the previous builds). And automatically create a chart showing the trend in code coverage and send via email to the project team.

Q23. A SUT has an existing automated test suite.
Which of the following statements relating to the introduction of new features in the SUT is TRUE?

Automated tests are not affected by the introduction of a new feature and running them against the new SUT is a waste of effort

The introduction of a new feature could require updates or additions to the testware components

The test automation engineer should work with the business analysts to ensure the new feature is testable

It is generally more difficult to automate test cases for a new feature as the developmenthas not yet started

Q24. Which of the following statements BEST describe aspects of the SUT to consider when designing a TAA?

All the interaction between SUT and TAS should belogged with the highest level of detail

All the internal test interfaces of the SUT should be removed prior to the product release

All the interface of the SUT affected by the tests should be controllable by the TAA

All the external test interfaces of the SUT should be removed prior to the product release

Q25. Which of the following success factors for a test automation project is TRUE?

Automated tests must be designed to capture only the datathat is strictly needed for comparing expected and actual results

The test cases to be automated first must always be selected based on the number of times a test will need to be run

The test cases to be automated must have a high dependency on particular data values

Automated tests that fail due to changes in the requirements of the SUT should be promptly fixed rather than disabled from the test suite

Q26. You are currently designing the TAA of a TAS. You have been asked to adopt an approach forautomatically generating and executing test cases from a model that defines the SUT. The SUT is a state-based and event-driven that is described by a finite-state machine and exposes its functionality via an API. The behavior of the SUT depends on hardwareand communication links that can be unreliable.
Which of the following aspects is MOST important when designing the TAA in this scenario?

Looking for tools that allows direct denoting of exceptions and actions depending on the SUT events.

Adopting a test definition strategy based on classification tree coverage for the test definition layer.

Looking for tools that allow performing setup and teardown of the test suites and the SUT.

Adopting a test definition strategy based on use case/exception case coverage for the definition layer.

Q27. Which of the following attributes should NOT be included in a test execution report associated with a suite of automated tests?

Summary of the test execution results

System/Application under test and its version

Defect clusters identified during test execution

Environment in which the tests have been executed

Q28. A TAS uses a commercial test automation tool and the default logs generated by the inconsistent formats such as different types of messages (pass/fail steps, screenshots, warnings, etc.) To solve this issue some custom logging functions have been created from the test scripts, making it possible tolog the different types of messages with the same format. However, this may cause a problem due to excessive size of the logs which can make it difficult to find the required information. Assume that all the default logs will be disabled when running theautomated tests and that some tests will not generate excessively sized logs.
Which of the following represents the BEST suggestion for implementing the custom logging functions?

Implement the custom logging functions without saving timestamps

Implement the custom logging functions to support different levels of tracing

Implement the custom logging functions without saving stack traces

Implement the custom logging functions to redirect the logs to multiple files

Q29. Consider a SUT that small run on multiple platform during the execution of automated test runs. In each test run an automated test suite needs to be executed, with the same version of the TAF, against the same version of the SUT of each platform. Each platform shall have its own dedicated test environment. Your goal is to implement a process as automated as possible ( i.e with minimal manual intervention) that allows implementing a consistent setup of the TAS across the multiple test environments.
Which two of the following aspects are MOST relevant for achieving your goal in this scenario?
* The configuration of the TAS uses automated installation scripts
* The TAF saves the logs needed to debug errors in XML format
C) Features of the TAF not used by the automated tests have been tested D) All the automated test cases contain the expected results E) The TAS components are under configuration management

A and e

B and c

B and d

A and d

Q30. Which of the following statement about the implementation of automated regression testing is FALSE?

When automating regression tests, the structure of automated tests must always be thesame as the corresponding manual tests

When automating regression tests, the corresponding manual tests should have already been executed to verify they operate correctly

When automating regression tests, the initialization steps set the testpreconditions should be automated wherever possible

When automating regression tests, consideration should be given to how much time would be saved by automation

Q31. You identified a suitable project to pilot an automation tool and planned and conduced a pilot. The pilot has been successful and tool Is being deployed within your organization, with a plan to increase tool use by the one project at a time. During this rollout some test processes will be changed slightly to gain additional benefits from using the tool.
Inthe pilot project, a small set of manual tests were automated for the first time. You are currently monitoring the test automation efficiency and this reveals that the automation regime for the tests is not yet mature.
Which of the following statements isTRUE?

The approach used for deployed this tool is aligned to the standard success factor for deployment

The pilot project should have been critical so that maximum benefits were delivered

The target defined for the project was inappropriate, because the automation regime for the automated tests at the end of the pilot is not yet mature.

The test process should be radically changed to gain additional benefits from using the tool.

Q32. Consider A TAS for testing adesktop application via its GUI. All the test cases of the automated test suite contain the same identical sequences of steps at the beginning (to create the necessary objects when doing a preliminary configuration of the test environment and at the end (to remove everything created -specifically for the test itself during the preliminary configuration of the test environment). All automated test cases use the same set of assertion functions from a shared library, for verifying the values in the GUI fields( e.g text boxes).
What is the BEST recommendation for improving the TAS?

Implementing keywords with higher level of granularity

Improving the architecture of the application in order to improve its testability

Adopting a set of standard verification methods for use by all automated tests

Implementing standard setup and teardown functions at test case level

Q33. Consider a TAS that exclusively uses the APIs of a SUT. To make this work, significant changes have been required to the SUT by adding a set of dedicated test interfaces to the APIs. All the automated tests will use these test interfaces when interacting with the SUT. Assume that you are currently verifying the correctness of the automated test environment and test tool setup.
Which of the following would you expect to be the MOST specific risk associated with this scenario?

The connectivity from the TAS to the dedicatedtest interfaces will not work

The process of configuring the TAS will be error-phone due to manual intervention

The automated test cases will not contain the expected result

False alarms, that are unlikely to occur in the real world, will be observed during testing

Q34. Consider a TAS that uses a keyword-driven framework. The SUT is a web application and there is a large set of keywords available for writingthe automated tests that relate to highly specific user actions linked directly to the GUI of the SUT. The automated test written with the keywords are statically analyzed by a custom tool which highlight’s repeated instances of identical sequence of keywords. The waiting mechanism implemented by the TAS for a webpage load is based on a synchronous sampling within a given timeout. The TAS allows checking a webpage load every seconds until a timeout value

Changing the scripting approach to data-driven scripting

Implementing keywords with a higher level of granularity

Changing the wait mechanism to explicit hard-coded waits

Establishing an error recovery process for TAS and SUT